Titre : |
الآليات القضائية لتفريد الجزاءات الجنائية. |
Type de document : |
texte imprimé |
Auteurs : |
نبيلة صدراتي, Auteur ; عبد الحفيظ طاشور, Directeur de thèse |
Editeur : |
جامعة الإخوة منتوري قسنطينة |
Année de publication : |
2019 |
Importance : |
396 ورقة. |
Format : |
30 سم. |
Note générale : |
2نسخ موجودة مكتبة المركزية
|
Langues : |
Arabe (ara) |
Catégories : |
Arabe القانون
|
Tags : |
التفريد القضائي الجزاء الجنائي قضاء التنفيذ التفريد التنفيذي إعادة التأهيل الاجتماعي للمحبوسين penal sanctions judicial individualization executive individualization executive judge the social rehabilitation of the detainees sanctions pénales l'individualisation judiciaire l’individualisation exécutive juges d’exécution réinsertion sociale des détenus |
Index. décimale : |
340 القانون |
Résumé : |
The individualization of penal sanctions is one of the most important elements of contemporary criminal policy, since the individualization allows for varying degrees of pain, both in quantity and quality, in order to suit the severity of the offender and the crime.The Algerian legislation is one of the most reliable methods in giving judges means and authorities for the judicial individualization. The main objective of the judicial individualization exclusivity provides the judge with available means for the individualization. The simplest forms are the assessment of penalties between the minimum and the maximum; and in approving more than principal penalty for each crime. Besides, giving the judge the power to choose one of them or to combine them, in addition to applying the mitigating circumstances system, as well as giving him the authority to tighten the penalty of return within the limits of legal regulation. In some cases, the legislator gave the judge the authority of individualization of the complementary penalty, which he governs with, besides the principal penalty. According to juvenile judge, he also has authorities of individualization of the penalty, which takes the direction of the juvenile delinquent, so that the legislator determines a list of measures and gives the judge the authorization to choose without having to judge a specific measure against a crime of its own, and other authorities. Among the most important guarantees, which ensure the safety of judicial individualization, are the medical examinations and the social investigations conducted on the accused, as well as the specialization of the criminal judge. Fulfilling the task of judicial individualization up till its implementation process, the legislator gave the executive judge broad authorities to achieve executive individualization, which means the individualization of each sentenced detainee during the execution process through a treatment that commensurate with the severity of his crime and suits his personality, health and psychological condition. The scope of the penalties, in which the penalty application judge is individualized during the implementation process, is restricted to the custodial penalties and the penalty of public benefit without security measures. In contrast, the juvenile judge and the penalty application judge takes the task of the supervision and the individualization, which are taking the juvenile’s direction as a disciplinary measure or custodial penalty. Thus, the individualization of penalty, which is made by the magistrate, is a complete individualization, thanks to the decisions made by the penalty application judge and the juvenile judge in the implementation process. This is on light of the results of the detainee’s personality, in order to achieve the ultimate purpose of the penalty, namely, the social rehabilitation of the detainees.
|
Diplôme : |
Doctorat |
En ligne : |
../theses/droit/ASED4362.pdf |
Format de la ressource électronique : |
pdf |
Permalink : |
index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=11146 |
الآليات القضائية لتفريد الجزاءات الجنائية. [texte imprimé] / نبيلة صدراتي, Auteur ; عبد الحفيظ طاشور, Directeur de thèse . - جامعة الإخوة منتوري قسنطينة, 2019 . - 396 ورقة. ; 30 سم. 2نسخ موجودة مكتبة المركزية
Langues : Arabe ( ara)
Catégories : |
Arabe القانون
|
Tags : |
التفريد القضائي الجزاء الجنائي قضاء التنفيذ التفريد التنفيذي إعادة التأهيل الاجتماعي للمحبوسين penal sanctions judicial individualization executive individualization executive judge the social rehabilitation of the detainees sanctions pénales l'individualisation judiciaire l’individualisation exécutive juges d’exécution réinsertion sociale des détenus |
Index. décimale : |
340 القانون |
Résumé : |
The individualization of penal sanctions is one of the most important elements of contemporary criminal policy, since the individualization allows for varying degrees of pain, both in quantity and quality, in order to suit the severity of the offender and the crime.The Algerian legislation is one of the most reliable methods in giving judges means and authorities for the judicial individualization. The main objective of the judicial individualization exclusivity provides the judge with available means for the individualization. The simplest forms are the assessment of penalties between the minimum and the maximum; and in approving more than principal penalty for each crime. Besides, giving the judge the power to choose one of them or to combine them, in addition to applying the mitigating circumstances system, as well as giving him the authority to tighten the penalty of return within the limits of legal regulation. In some cases, the legislator gave the judge the authority of individualization of the complementary penalty, which he governs with, besides the principal penalty. According to juvenile judge, he also has authorities of individualization of the penalty, which takes the direction of the juvenile delinquent, so that the legislator determines a list of measures and gives the judge the authorization to choose without having to judge a specific measure against a crime of its own, and other authorities. Among the most important guarantees, which ensure the safety of judicial individualization, are the medical examinations and the social investigations conducted on the accused, as well as the specialization of the criminal judge. Fulfilling the task of judicial individualization up till its implementation process, the legislator gave the executive judge broad authorities to achieve executive individualization, which means the individualization of each sentenced detainee during the execution process through a treatment that commensurate with the severity of his crime and suits his personality, health and psychological condition. The scope of the penalties, in which the penalty application judge is individualized during the implementation process, is restricted to the custodial penalties and the penalty of public benefit without security measures. In contrast, the juvenile judge and the penalty application judge takes the task of the supervision and the individualization, which are taking the juvenile’s direction as a disciplinary measure or custodial penalty. Thus, the individualization of penalty, which is made by the magistrate, is a complete individualization, thanks to the decisions made by the penalty application judge and the juvenile judge in the implementation process. This is on light of the results of the detainee’s personality, in order to achieve the ultimate purpose of the penalty, namely, the social rehabilitation of the detainees.
|
Diplôme : |
Doctorat |
En ligne : |
../theses/droit/ASED4362.pdf |
Format de la ressource électronique : |
pdf |
Permalink : |
index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=11146 |
|