Détail de l'auteur
Auteur Fatima Maameri |
Documents disponibles écrits par cet auteur (4)
Affiner la recherche Interroger des sources externes
Titre : Arab Americans in Post-9/11 america : The locus of racism and the change of dynamics. Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Billel Filali, Auteur ; Fatima Maameri, Directeur de thèse Editeur : جامعة الإخوة منتوري قسنطينة Année de publication : 2022 Importance : 234 f. Format : 30 cm. Note générale : 1 copies imprimées disponibles
Langues : Français (fre) Catégories : Français - Anglais
Langue AnglaiseTags : English Language: American Civilization États-Unis d’Amérique Arabo-américains Musulmans américains Racialisation Stéréotypes Orientalisme post-9/11 guerre contre le terrorisme الولايات المتحدة الامريكية العرب الامريكيون المسلمون الامريكيون العنصرة الصور النمطية الاستشراق ما بعد 9سبتمبر الحرب على الارهاب Index. décimale : 420 Anglais et vieil anglais (anglo-saxon) : indice de base 42 Résumé :
In the United States, no other ethnic group has been under suspicion and surveillance as Arab Americans in the aftermath of 9/11. Despite constitutional statements and legislations on civil rights and individual liberties, Arab Americans were compelled to redefine their identity to be consistent with Americanism and prove their Americanness. This research analyzes the status of Arab Americans in the United States’ racial framework in post-9/11America. In addition to highlighting the role the attacks played in altering the nature of the racial paradox, its consequences, and impacts, this research investigates the conversion of Arab Americans’ posture from invisibility to hypervisibility. More, it sheds light on the collaboration of the general public, media, and government for racializing Arab Americans. As a result, the locus of racialization shifted from imagined misconceptions and ill-mannered stereotypes to more overt and aggressive attitudes that became manifest in hate crimes, unjustified detentions, and deportations. For a better understanding of the racialization of Arab Americans prior and following 9/11, this research scrutinizes different theories on race, identity, and prevailing stereotypes. It concludes that the legitimation of racialization operated as a catalyst for the construction of a hegemonic discourse on the Arab/Muslim terrorist.Note de contenu :
Appendix.Diplôme : Doctorat en sciences En ligne : ../theses/anglais/FIL1607.pdf Format de la ressource électronique : Permalink : index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=11838 Arab Americans in Post-9/11 america : The locus of racism and the change of dynamics. [texte imprimé] / Billel Filali, Auteur ; Fatima Maameri, Directeur de thèse . - جامعة الإخوة منتوري قسنطينة, 2022 . - 234 f. ; 30 cm.
1 copies imprimées disponibles
Langues : Français (fre)
Catégories : Français - Anglais
Langue AnglaiseTags : English Language: American Civilization États-Unis d’Amérique Arabo-américains Musulmans américains Racialisation Stéréotypes Orientalisme post-9/11 guerre contre le terrorisme الولايات المتحدة الامريكية العرب الامريكيون المسلمون الامريكيون العنصرة الصور النمطية الاستشراق ما بعد 9سبتمبر الحرب على الارهاب Index. décimale : 420 Anglais et vieil anglais (anglo-saxon) : indice de base 42 Résumé :
In the United States, no other ethnic group has been under suspicion and surveillance as Arab Americans in the aftermath of 9/11. Despite constitutional statements and legislations on civil rights and individual liberties, Arab Americans were compelled to redefine their identity to be consistent with Americanism and prove their Americanness. This research analyzes the status of Arab Americans in the United States’ racial framework in post-9/11America. In addition to highlighting the role the attacks played in altering the nature of the racial paradox, its consequences, and impacts, this research investigates the conversion of Arab Americans’ posture from invisibility to hypervisibility. More, it sheds light on the collaboration of the general public, media, and government for racializing Arab Americans. As a result, the locus of racialization shifted from imagined misconceptions and ill-mannered stereotypes to more overt and aggressive attitudes that became manifest in hate crimes, unjustified detentions, and deportations. For a better understanding of the racialization of Arab Americans prior and following 9/11, this research scrutinizes different theories on race, identity, and prevailing stereotypes. It concludes that the legitimation of racialization operated as a catalyst for the construction of a hegemonic discourse on the Arab/Muslim terrorist.Note de contenu :
Appendix.Diplôme : Doctorat en sciences En ligne : ../theses/anglais/FIL1607.pdf Format de la ressource électronique : Permalink : index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=11838 Exemplaires (1)
Code-barres Cote Support Localisation Section Disponibilité FIL/1607 FIL/1607 Thèse Bibliothèque principale Thèses Disponible Ottoman Algeria in Western diplomatic history with particular emphasis on relations with the united states of America, 1776-1816 / Fatima Maameri
Titre : Ottoman Algeria in Western diplomatic history with particular emphasis on relations with the united states of America, 1776-1816 Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Fatima Maameri ; Univ. de Constantine, Éditeur scientifique ; Brahim Harouni, Directeur de thèse Année de publication : 2008 Importance : 440 f. Format : 30 cm Note générale : Deux disponibles à la salle de recherche Trois disponibles au magasin de la bibliothèque universitaire centrale
+01 CDLangues : Anglais (eng) Catégories : Français - Anglais
Langue AnglaiseTags : Ottoman Algeria Western diplomatic history Relations United states of America Index. décimale : 420 Anglais et vieil anglais (anglo-saxon) : indice de base 42 Résumé : Recent western writings deploying analogies between ‘Barbary piracy’ and twentyfirst century ‘terrorism’ justify a reappraisal of diplomatic relations between the Ottoman regency of Algiers and the United States during the period 1776-1816. Since the 9/11 attacks, American historians have represented the ‘Barbary Wars’ as the direct forerunner of current ‘Muslim terrorism’. For the purpose, they transposed late 18th and early 19th centuries events into the 21st century; the result is an unsound equation in which the ‘terrorist’ of today is likened to the ‘pirate’ of yesterday and by reversal transposition, the Muslim corsair, already seen as a pirate, has been transformed into a terrorist. This study opted for rereading the same material on which current interpretations are built and reveals that, in many cases, documents pertaining to that period were either overlooked or were not published until recently, a fact which made this reappraisal possible. By reassessing relations between Algiers and the USA, this work replaces the issue of ‘piracy’ into its true historical context and discusses two major elements: the traditional clash between Islam and Christianity and persistence of enmity towards Algiers in American foreign policy although under
a different guise. The analysis shows that allegations of Algerian aggressions against the USA were unfounded and elaborates a ‘Dey-pawn theory’ which shows how ‘power politics’ entangled Algiers in major powers rivalries and turned it into a scapegoat for Christianity. The work also investigates the amalgam between corsairing and piracy and considers that its attribution to Muslims solely denotes a renewal of medieval crusading because when America embarked on a gunboat diplomacy, it also contended that Muslim corsairing states legitimated maritime terror in the name of jihad. The thesis reconsiders America’s bullying past and unveils less idealistic agendas that were performed in total disregard of laws and usage of nations.
The thesis concludes that Algerian seamen were not pirates but they were corsairs legitimated in their actions by the very western standards and that assertions about ‘Algerine piracy’ were fabrications that were meant for cloaking gunboat aggression in defensive disguise to promote American interests abroad.Diplôme : Doctorat En ligne : ../theses/anglais/MAA1018 .pdf Permalink : index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=4895 Ottoman Algeria in Western diplomatic history with particular emphasis on relations with the united states of America, 1776-1816 [texte imprimé] / Fatima Maameri ; Univ. de Constantine, Éditeur scientifique ; Brahim Harouni, Directeur de thèse . - 2008 . - 440 f. ; 30 cm.
Deux disponibles à la salle de recherche Trois disponibles au magasin de la bibliothèque universitaire centrale
+01 CD
Langues : Anglais (eng)
Catégories : Français - Anglais
Langue AnglaiseTags : Ottoman Algeria Western diplomatic history Relations United states of America Index. décimale : 420 Anglais et vieil anglais (anglo-saxon) : indice de base 42 Résumé : Recent western writings deploying analogies between ‘Barbary piracy’ and twentyfirst century ‘terrorism’ justify a reappraisal of diplomatic relations between the Ottoman regency of Algiers and the United States during the period 1776-1816. Since the 9/11 attacks, American historians have represented the ‘Barbary Wars’ as the direct forerunner of current ‘Muslim terrorism’. For the purpose, they transposed late 18th and early 19th centuries events into the 21st century; the result is an unsound equation in which the ‘terrorist’ of today is likened to the ‘pirate’ of yesterday and by reversal transposition, the Muslim corsair, already seen as a pirate, has been transformed into a terrorist. This study opted for rereading the same material on which current interpretations are built and reveals that, in many cases, documents pertaining to that period were either overlooked or were not published until recently, a fact which made this reappraisal possible. By reassessing relations between Algiers and the USA, this work replaces the issue of ‘piracy’ into its true historical context and discusses two major elements: the traditional clash between Islam and Christianity and persistence of enmity towards Algiers in American foreign policy although under
a different guise. The analysis shows that allegations of Algerian aggressions against the USA were unfounded and elaborates a ‘Dey-pawn theory’ which shows how ‘power politics’ entangled Algiers in major powers rivalries and turned it into a scapegoat for Christianity. The work also investigates the amalgam between corsairing and piracy and considers that its attribution to Muslims solely denotes a renewal of medieval crusading because when America embarked on a gunboat diplomacy, it also contended that Muslim corsairing states legitimated maritime terror in the name of jihad. The thesis reconsiders America’s bullying past and unveils less idealistic agendas that were performed in total disregard of laws and usage of nations.
The thesis concludes that Algerian seamen were not pirates but they were corsairs legitimated in their actions by the very western standards and that assertions about ‘Algerine piracy’ were fabrications that were meant for cloaking gunboat aggression in defensive disguise to promote American interests abroad.Diplôme : Doctorat En ligne : ../theses/anglais/MAA1018 .pdf Permalink : index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=4895 Exemplaires (1)
Code-barres Cote Support Localisation Section Disponibilité MAA/1018 MAA/1018 Thèse Bibliothèque principale Thèses Disponible
Titre : The american government policy response to homegrown terrorism Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Hayette Harbi, Auteur ; Fatima Maameri, Directeur de thèse Editeur : جامعة الإخوة منتوري قسنطينة Année de publication : 2019 Importance : 197 f. Format : 30 cm. Note générale : 1 copies imprimées disponibles
Langues : Anglais (eng) Catégories : Français - Anglais
Langue AnglaiseTags : English Language: American Studies terrorisme local contre-terrorisme contre-radicalisation musulmans américains homegrown terrorism counterterrorism counter-radicalization American Muslims الإرهاب المحلي مكافحة الإرهاب مكافحة التطرف المسلمين الامريكيين Index. décimale : 420 Anglais et vieil anglais (anglo-saxon) : indice de base 42 Résumé :
In any society, questions on the appropriate scale and role of authority in matters of citizens‘ rights and liberties lead to competing visions. Recently, the measures adopted to maintain domestic security in the face of threats to society revived such debates. The issue is how far that authority‘s response is legitimate when it uses security precautions at the expense of people‘s freedoms. In this thesis, we aim to assess the legitimacy of the U.S. government‘s response to homegrown terrorism. We examine the U.S. government‘s policies and we show how far they are dual regarding the treatment of Muslims. Indeed, on one side, they promote non-discriminatory measures, and on the other side, however, they fixate almost entirely on Islam, consider Muslims as suspects and identify Muslims‘ places of worship as a venue of radicalization. We question the legitimacy of such policies by assessing key assumptions underlying the U.S. government discourse on which these policies are
based. To that end, we take a genealogical approach to identify the roots of such assumptions. We find that the U.S. government is reproducing past discourses. Then, we use theological arguments, scholarly contributions, and current data to evaluate the soundness of the assumptions underlying these discourses. We conclude that the
measures that encroach on Muslims‘ freedoms are illegitimate in that they derive from discourses based on flawed assumptions.Note de contenu :
Appendix.
Diplôme : Doctorat en sciences En ligne : ../theses/anglais/HAR1573.pdf Format de la ressource électronique : Permalink : index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=11683 The american government policy response to homegrown terrorism [texte imprimé] / Hayette Harbi, Auteur ; Fatima Maameri, Directeur de thèse . - جامعة الإخوة منتوري قسنطينة, 2019 . - 197 f. ; 30 cm.
1 copies imprimées disponibles
Langues : Anglais (eng)
Catégories : Français - Anglais
Langue AnglaiseTags : English Language: American Studies terrorisme local contre-terrorisme contre-radicalisation musulmans américains homegrown terrorism counterterrorism counter-radicalization American Muslims الإرهاب المحلي مكافحة الإرهاب مكافحة التطرف المسلمين الامريكيين Index. décimale : 420 Anglais et vieil anglais (anglo-saxon) : indice de base 42 Résumé :
In any society, questions on the appropriate scale and role of authority in matters of citizens‘ rights and liberties lead to competing visions. Recently, the measures adopted to maintain domestic security in the face of threats to society revived such debates. The issue is how far that authority‘s response is legitimate when it uses security precautions at the expense of people‘s freedoms. In this thesis, we aim to assess the legitimacy of the U.S. government‘s response to homegrown terrorism. We examine the U.S. government‘s policies and we show how far they are dual regarding the treatment of Muslims. Indeed, on one side, they promote non-discriminatory measures, and on the other side, however, they fixate almost entirely on Islam, consider Muslims as suspects and identify Muslims‘ places of worship as a venue of radicalization. We question the legitimacy of such policies by assessing key assumptions underlying the U.S. government discourse on which these policies are
based. To that end, we take a genealogical approach to identify the roots of such assumptions. We find that the U.S. government is reproducing past discourses. Then, we use theological arguments, scholarly contributions, and current data to evaluate the soundness of the assumptions underlying these discourses. We conclude that the
measures that encroach on Muslims‘ freedoms are illegitimate in that they derive from discourses based on flawed assumptions.Note de contenu :
Appendix.
Diplôme : Doctorat en sciences En ligne : ../theses/anglais/HAR1573.pdf Format de la ressource électronique : Permalink : index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=11683 Exemplaires (1)
Code-barres Cote Support Localisation Section Disponibilité HAR/1573 HAR/1573 Thèse Bibliothèque principale Thèses Disponible
Titre : The contradiction between Barack Obama’s exceptionality and his mitigated effect on racial prejudice. Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Naima Harbi, Auteur ; Fatima Maameri, Directeur de thèse Editeur : جامعة الإخوة منتوري قسنطينة Année de publication : 2019 Importance : 272 f. Format : 30 cm. Note générale : 1 copies imprimées disponibles
Langues : Anglais (eng) Catégories : Français - Anglais
Langue AnglaiseTags : english Language: American Studies préjudice racial Barack Obama post-racialisme exceptionnalisme racisme racial prejudice post-racialism exceptionality racism التحيز العنصري باراك أوباما ما بعد العنصرية حالة استثنائية Index. décimale : 420 Anglais et vieil anglais (anglo-saxon) : indice de base 42 Résumé :
Although the United States has undeniably done significant progress in the struggle against racism, racial prejudice persists. Nevertheless, the 2008 historical election of the first Afro-American Barack Obama as president of the United States was widely acclaimed as evidence of American post-racialism and even of the toll of racism. Although Obama seemed the ideal person to confront the race problem, he could obtain only mitigated results. This research examines the state of racial prejudice in the American society in relation to Obama’s candidacy, election and presidency. It also strives to assess the president’s personal responsibility in its persistence. At the core of this thesis is a tentative explanation of the contradiction between Obama’s exceptionality and his mitigated results in the struggle against the race problem. This research concludes that Barack Obama certainly bears some responsibility in the persistence of racial prejudice. Nevertheless, his personal burden needs to be tempered with in view of the impossibility of the task due to the presence of insuperable external factors on which the president himself had little or no ascendancy.
Diplôme : Doctorat en sciences En ligne : ../theses/anglais/HAR1572.pdf Format de la ressource électronique : Permalink : index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=11681 The contradiction between Barack Obama’s exceptionality and his mitigated effect on racial prejudice. [texte imprimé] / Naima Harbi, Auteur ; Fatima Maameri, Directeur de thèse . - جامعة الإخوة منتوري قسنطينة, 2019 . - 272 f. ; 30 cm.
1 copies imprimées disponibles
Langues : Anglais (eng)
Catégories : Français - Anglais
Langue AnglaiseTags : english Language: American Studies préjudice racial Barack Obama post-racialisme exceptionnalisme racisme racial prejudice post-racialism exceptionality racism التحيز العنصري باراك أوباما ما بعد العنصرية حالة استثنائية Index. décimale : 420 Anglais et vieil anglais (anglo-saxon) : indice de base 42 Résumé :
Although the United States has undeniably done significant progress in the struggle against racism, racial prejudice persists. Nevertheless, the 2008 historical election of the first Afro-American Barack Obama as president of the United States was widely acclaimed as evidence of American post-racialism and even of the toll of racism. Although Obama seemed the ideal person to confront the race problem, he could obtain only mitigated results. This research examines the state of racial prejudice in the American society in relation to Obama’s candidacy, election and presidency. It also strives to assess the president’s personal responsibility in its persistence. At the core of this thesis is a tentative explanation of the contradiction between Obama’s exceptionality and his mitigated results in the struggle against the race problem. This research concludes that Barack Obama certainly bears some responsibility in the persistence of racial prejudice. Nevertheless, his personal burden needs to be tempered with in view of the impossibility of the task due to the presence of insuperable external factors on which the president himself had little or no ascendancy.
Diplôme : Doctorat en sciences En ligne : ../theses/anglais/HAR1572.pdf Format de la ressource électronique : Permalink : index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=11681 Exemplaires (1)
Code-barres Cote Support Localisation Section Disponibilité HAR/1572 HAR/1572 Thèse Bibliothèque principale Thèses Disponible
