| Titre : |
تنازع الإختصاص بین القضاء الجنائي الدولي والتشریعات الوطنیة |
| Type de document : |
texte imprimé |
| Auteurs : |
وردة ملاك, Auteur ; محمد باوني, Directeur de thèse |
| Editeur : |
جامعة الإخوة منتوري قسنطينة |
| Année de publication : |
2017 |
| Importance : |
527 ورقة. |
| Format : |
30 سم. |
| Note générale : |
2نسخ موجودة مكتبة المركزية
|
| Langues : |
Arabe (ara) |
| Catégories : |
Arabe
القانون
|
| Tags : |
الجریمة القضاء الجنائي الدول المحاكم الإختصاص التنازع التكامل crime the judiciary criminal states courts jurisdiction conflict complementary |
| Index. décimale : |
340 القانون |
| Résumé : |
There is very clear relationship between the International Criminal Court and national courts, which is the complementary relationship,its features were made clear through the text of the Rome Statute, and in order for this cooperation to achieve its goal and reaping the fruit there must be a coordination between international law and national legislation, through the commitment of the countries that accepted and ratified the Statute of the international Tribunal Through harmonization and amendments affecting the
constitutional side, as well as legislation in deference to the requirements of international law and international criminal justice.
The conflict of jurisdiction between the international criminal justice system and national legislation will have no existence if countries in various positions abstained from undermining justice by supporting a policy of impunity and create hotbeds of tension in various parts of the world, and the international
community is convinced that the real deterrent to perpetrators of international crimes is to support international criminal jurisdiction to be a judicial system politically independent and neutral towards all individuals at all levels, and the commitment to deliver justice to the victims of serious crimes and bring
transparency and emphasis on efficiency in the application, so that this judiciary is the last resort in the trial of war criminals and armed conflicts after the National criminal justice, and the permanent international Criminal Court remains the realistic interface to this international judiciary in the face
of international crimes if there is an actual circumvention around it by the entire international community.
|
| Diplôme : |
Doctorat en sciences |
| En ligne : |
../theses/droit/AMEL4252.pdf |
| Format de la ressource électronique : |
pdf |
| Permalink : |
index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=10730 |
تنازع الإختصاص بین القضاء الجنائي الدولي والتشریعات الوطنیة [texte imprimé] / وردة ملاك, Auteur ; محمد باوني, Directeur de thèse . - جامعة الإخوة منتوري قسنطينة, 2017 . - 527 ورقة. ; 30 سم. 2نسخ موجودة مكتبة المركزية
Langues : Arabe ( ara)
| Catégories : |
Arabe
القانون
|
| Tags : |
الجریمة القضاء الجنائي الدول المحاكم الإختصاص التنازع التكامل crime the judiciary criminal states courts jurisdiction conflict complementary |
| Index. décimale : |
340 القانون |
| Résumé : |
There is very clear relationship between the International Criminal Court and national courts, which is the complementary relationship,its features were made clear through the text of the Rome Statute, and in order for this cooperation to achieve its goal and reaping the fruit there must be a coordination between international law and national legislation, through the commitment of the countries that accepted and ratified the Statute of the international Tribunal Through harmonization and amendments affecting the
constitutional side, as well as legislation in deference to the requirements of international law and international criminal justice.
The conflict of jurisdiction between the international criminal justice system and national legislation will have no existence if countries in various positions abstained from undermining justice by supporting a policy of impunity and create hotbeds of tension in various parts of the world, and the international
community is convinced that the real deterrent to perpetrators of international crimes is to support international criminal jurisdiction to be a judicial system politically independent and neutral towards all individuals at all levels, and the commitment to deliver justice to the victims of serious crimes and bring
transparency and emphasis on efficiency in the application, so that this judiciary is the last resort in the trial of war criminals and armed conflicts after the National criminal justice, and the permanent international Criminal Court remains the realistic interface to this international judiciary in the face
of international crimes if there is an actual circumvention around it by the entire international community.
|
| Diplôme : |
Doctorat en sciences |
| En ligne : |
../theses/droit/AMEL4252.pdf |
| Format de la ressource électronique : |
pdf |
| Permalink : |
index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=10730 |
|
Affiner la recherche Interroger des sources externes
