Détail de l'auteur
Auteur Abderrahim Bouderbane |
Documents disponibles écrits par cet auteur (2)
Affiner la recherche Interroger des sources externesA comparison between the impact of the tasks rhetorical argumentation and narrating stories on fluency and accuracy. / Abderrahim Bouderbane
Titre : A comparison between the impact of the tasks rhetorical argumentation and narrating stories on fluency and accuracy. : A case study of second year students at the University of Constantine. Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Abderrahim Bouderbane, Auteur ; Riad Belouahem, Directeur de thèse Editeur : جامعة الإخوة منتوري قسنطينة Année de publication : 2017 Importance : 276 f. Format : 30 cm. Note générale : 2 copies imprimées disponibles.
Langues : Anglais (eng) Catégories : Français - Anglais
Langue AnglaiseTags : Argumentation Rhétorique Narration des Histoires Fluidité Précision Expression Orale rhetorical argumentation narrating stories fluency accuracy oral expression الحجج البلاغية سرد القصص الطلاقة الدقة التعبير الشفوي Index. décimale : 420 Anglais et vieil anglais (anglo-saxon) : indice de base 42 Résumé : The present study is a comparison between the impact of rhetorical argumentation and narrating stories on students’ fluency and accuracy in communicative competence. We aimed at evaluating the usefulness and suitability of these tasks, and their efficiency when it comes to teaching fluency and accuracy by analysing the direct effects of the tasks on the indices of fluency and accuracy. The problematic issue in this research investigates the effects of the task rhetorical argumentation, and whether it is an important task that teachers should rely on it in teaching speaking in academic contexts. The research hypotheses are used to probe the aims and they are: 1) - If students are taught how to organize information rhetorically, then they will master fluency and accuracy. 2) - If rhetorical argumentation is used as a communicative task in the classroom, then the students’ level of fluency and accuracy will improve. 3) - Teachers should be made aware that rhetorical argumentation is more suitable than narrating stories for teaching fluency and accuracy in academic contexts. In this research, we worked with second year students at the University of Frères Mentouri, Constantine.
The sample is composed of 65 students which are divided in between 30 students in the control group and 35 students in experimental group. The data was collected by two research methods: a classroom observation and an experiment. The former is used to evaluate three main areas which are: classroom interaction, topic knowledge and language knowledge. The latter is developed with a pre-test and a post-test to validate or invalidate the research hypotheses by calculating the coefficient correlation (r), t-test and the standard deviation. The results of the experiment show that there are two types of fluency which are procedural and automatic, rhetorical argumentation can be used to develop procedural fluency, and not automatic since the task is considered as difficult and students were not familiar with it. While the task of narrating stories strengthens students automatic fluency since the task was familiar to they and they already possess schema knowledge.
Diplôme : Doctorat En ligne : ../theses/anglais/BOU1434.pdf Format de la ressource électronique : Permalink : index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=10636 A comparison between the impact of the tasks rhetorical argumentation and narrating stories on fluency and accuracy. : A case study of second year students at the University of Constantine. [texte imprimé] / Abderrahim Bouderbane, Auteur ; Riad Belouahem, Directeur de thèse . - جامعة الإخوة منتوري قسنطينة, 2017 . - 276 f. ; 30 cm.
2 copies imprimées disponibles.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
Catégories : Français - Anglais
Langue AnglaiseTags : Argumentation Rhétorique Narration des Histoires Fluidité Précision Expression Orale rhetorical argumentation narrating stories fluency accuracy oral expression الحجج البلاغية سرد القصص الطلاقة الدقة التعبير الشفوي Index. décimale : 420 Anglais et vieil anglais (anglo-saxon) : indice de base 42 Résumé : The present study is a comparison between the impact of rhetorical argumentation and narrating stories on students’ fluency and accuracy in communicative competence. We aimed at evaluating the usefulness and suitability of these tasks, and their efficiency when it comes to teaching fluency and accuracy by analysing the direct effects of the tasks on the indices of fluency and accuracy. The problematic issue in this research investigates the effects of the task rhetorical argumentation, and whether it is an important task that teachers should rely on it in teaching speaking in academic contexts. The research hypotheses are used to probe the aims and they are: 1) - If students are taught how to organize information rhetorically, then they will master fluency and accuracy. 2) - If rhetorical argumentation is used as a communicative task in the classroom, then the students’ level of fluency and accuracy will improve. 3) - Teachers should be made aware that rhetorical argumentation is more suitable than narrating stories for teaching fluency and accuracy in academic contexts. In this research, we worked with second year students at the University of Frères Mentouri, Constantine.
The sample is composed of 65 students which are divided in between 30 students in the control group and 35 students in experimental group. The data was collected by two research methods: a classroom observation and an experiment. The former is used to evaluate three main areas which are: classroom interaction, topic knowledge and language knowledge. The latter is developed with a pre-test and a post-test to validate or invalidate the research hypotheses by calculating the coefficient correlation (r), t-test and the standard deviation. The results of the experiment show that there are two types of fluency which are procedural and automatic, rhetorical argumentation can be used to develop procedural fluency, and not automatic since the task is considered as difficult and students were not familiar with it. While the task of narrating stories strengthens students automatic fluency since the task was familiar to they and they already possess schema knowledge.
Diplôme : Doctorat En ligne : ../theses/anglais/BOU1434.pdf Format de la ressource électronique : Permalink : index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=10636 Exemplaires (1)
Code-barres Cote Support Localisation Section Disponibilité BOU/1434 BOU/1434 Thèse Bibliothèque principale Thèses Disponible
Titre : The importance of outlining in developing good essays for foreign language writers : A case study of second year students at Mentouri-University Constantine Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Abderrahim Bouderbane, Auteur ; Samir Laraba, Directeur de thèse Editeur : Constantine : Université Mentouri Constantine Année de publication : 2009 Importance : 91 f. Format : 31 cm Note générale : Master
2 copies imprimées disponiblesLangues : Anglais (eng) Catégories : Français - Anglais
Langue AnglaiseTags : Langue Anglaise Index. décimale : 420 Anglais et vieil anglais (anglo-saxon) : indice de base 42 Résumé : Writing in second and foreign language contexts is a discovery of new things. Because it is to find out how to write strategically, instead of only translating preconceived ideas into text. That is to say writing for novice writers is based on developing strategies of writing, for implementing knowledge and transforming it to the readers. In all the models of writing being tackled in this research, Hayes and Flower (1980), Bereiter and Scardamalia (1987), the discovery involved, was highly based on the problem-solving issue to show the difference between novice writers and expert writers, and to give examples of how they process knowledge in writing. Experts determine a set of goals for their texts, and organize the ideas using outlining and planning strategies.
While novice writers write the ideas prompted in their minds spontaneously and translate them directly into a text. This study investigates the importance of outlining in developing and organizing good texts for student‟s writers enrolled in Mentouri University (Constantine).
It represents a case study of 40 students chosen to represent the experimental group and the control group through the evaluation of their final papers presented at the end of the test. We attempted to know the importance of this strategy in writing and what impact it has on the students writing. Hence, we evaluated four basic writing criteria in our student‟s papers (The targeted audience, content and organization, rhetorical functions, and coherence and cohesion). There were no significant differences between the performance of the experimental group and the performance of the control group.Diplôme : Master 2 En ligne : ../theses/anglais/BOU1263.pdf Format de la ressource électronique : Permalink : index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=5743 The importance of outlining in developing good essays for foreign language writers : A case study of second year students at Mentouri-University Constantine [texte imprimé] / Abderrahim Bouderbane, Auteur ; Samir Laraba, Directeur de thèse . - Constantine : Université Mentouri Constantine, 2009 . - 91 f. ; 31 cm.
Master
2 copies imprimées disponibles
Langues : Anglais (eng)
Catégories : Français - Anglais
Langue AnglaiseTags : Langue Anglaise Index. décimale : 420 Anglais et vieil anglais (anglo-saxon) : indice de base 42 Résumé : Writing in second and foreign language contexts is a discovery of new things. Because it is to find out how to write strategically, instead of only translating preconceived ideas into text. That is to say writing for novice writers is based on developing strategies of writing, for implementing knowledge and transforming it to the readers. In all the models of writing being tackled in this research, Hayes and Flower (1980), Bereiter and Scardamalia (1987), the discovery involved, was highly based on the problem-solving issue to show the difference between novice writers and expert writers, and to give examples of how they process knowledge in writing. Experts determine a set of goals for their texts, and organize the ideas using outlining and planning strategies.
While novice writers write the ideas prompted in their minds spontaneously and translate them directly into a text. This study investigates the importance of outlining in developing and organizing good texts for student‟s writers enrolled in Mentouri University (Constantine).
It represents a case study of 40 students chosen to represent the experimental group and the control group through the evaluation of their final papers presented at the end of the test. We attempted to know the importance of this strategy in writing and what impact it has on the students writing. Hence, we evaluated four basic writing criteria in our student‟s papers (The targeted audience, content and organization, rhetorical functions, and coherence and cohesion). There were no significant differences between the performance of the experimental group and the performance of the control group.Diplôme : Master 2 En ligne : ../theses/anglais/BOU1263.pdf Format de la ressource électronique : Permalink : index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=5743 Exemplaires (1)
Code-barres Cote Support Localisation Section Disponibilité BOU/1263 BOU/1263 Thèse Bibliothèque principale Thèses Disponible
